Parts of the sports press have had their hearts and minds set on a particular kind of England and English football for as long as they've been copy and pasting press releases into their pieces. The name "Roy Hodgson" tends not to pass across their keyboards surrounded by positive adjectives. In the pursuit for an English manager to take on the English role ("We gotta have a man who can speak to our BOYS AND LIONS!!!111"), there is a tendency to look over the 'wrong kind' of Englishman. None of this foreign muck any more, we've tried and failed too many times....over...about forty-five years......and we're not about to start turning around that particular boat now by looking past candidates who have been walking through the streets of central London wearing neon-lit arrows attached to their shoulders with the slogan "Well, it's obvious, innit" flashing away.
On the way to the big twist ending so liked of the daily drama scribes are two men who would be the perennial bad boys of Albert Street or Costa del Eldorado. Hodgson is the nice but dull character with the story arc taking in successive promotions at a small firm of travel agents before an embarrassing event at Heathrow Airport cuts him down to size at the expense of the show's bad boy rival, namely one Harry Redknapp, and audiences soon fill their boots with the daily exploits of the rough and ready businessman (NOT a wheeler-dealer). Having his wicked way with the girls at the factory or contacts at an industrial estate, Redknapp becomes the loveable rogue in the shape of Mike Baldwin, loved and hated for being rough and ready and eager to sniff out a bargain rather than doing things by the book.
The England job has always had the air of farce about it, not least because, as with coverage of soap operas and reality TV, the press have muddled up reality and hype into a bundle of breathless farce. "Hodgson verses Redknapp" is perfect for tabloid sports writers, because it can be boiled down to "English verses Foreign" or even "Honesty (perceived) verses Dishonest (perceived)". As with soap opera actors, characters are given nicknames and are subjected to pantomime boos ("TURNIP!" "FABIO THE FLOP!"). There is no reality in the hyper-real sports reporting bubble.
Following the tabloid led execution of Fabio Capello (successful manager around the world until he came up against the Collective England for the English Corps. of tabloid sports writers), the 'papers have been rallying around the establishment choice. Redknapp has been the industry favourite for years, to the extent that it appeared nobody else would be considered. His Spurs side were riding high enough in the league for his supporters to use that alone as evidence for suitability in the run-up to this year's European Championships. Yes the FA has midhandled the Capello resignation and subsequent selection process to such a degree that we could be entering the competition without a manger in charge at all, but at least there's 'Arry proving his worth every week!
Consequently, and it can only BE consequently, Spurs have plummeted like the proverbial since the New Year, doubtlessly because like all people who have been promised a new job sometime down the line concentration levels do seem to wander. That Hodgson was perceived to have failed at Liverpool made the press all the more eager to big up 'their man'. All the international club and country experience Hodgson has enjoyed could only have been responsible for not quite 'getting' what a club side like Liverpool really wanted from a manager, and our 'Arry can seek out the no-nonsense English way of doing things like no other. "We want an Englishman for England" was just code for wanting 'one of ours', wide-boy accent an' all, to follow the considered, complicated tastes of Sven and Capello.
Point-by-point, it's the West Brom manager who has the more trophies and achievements as well a world-wise experience. Back-page journos always want conflict, within and beyond any dressing room bust-ups and the like, which is partly how the contrived rivalry has been fostered over so many years. Tabloids have brought down people at a finger-click, and will do so with Roy at their whim, as and when it's seen that Redknapp would have made better/more credible/logical choices in his position.
The press bring down their enemies in the end - fictitious television baddies and political wannabes alike. Whether they will do the same to Hodgson before, during or after the forthcoming European Championship depends on what kind of storyline twist they fancy attempting for their own entertainment. There will be no real war of words between the two favoured candidates in front of the cameras, of course. Each instalment will be more breathless and contrived than the last, leading to a summer showdown with Poland/Ukraine as a suitable backdrop. Nothing ever gets resolved in soap opera land because it suits the television companies to keep characters living, dying, marrying and divorcing month after month - it suits both front and back pages if the same happens with 'Arry and Roy. If you think television drama is the loser with the popularity of soaps, you wait to see what happens to football at the end of all this....