The aftermath flushed out all suggestions and attempts to clean up politics as though the establishment was blowing down the garden hose that had been stuffed on the tallest ledge of the shed for the best part of the year. "PR! Smaller House of Commons! An independent expenses regime! Dealing with lobbyi....Stuff!"
One of the bright ideas coming through all of this mild panic was the "right to recall", a mechanism through which people could get their MP off the green benches and into the Job Centre...Or at least an enforced by-election of some sort. The Labour Party love "right to recall" so much that they still put it on their website - look, it's here in their manifesto section. And the Tories thought it was a good idea too - in April of last year they explained how right to recall might work.
Deputy PM Nick Clegg described plans for a right to recall in a Q&A session in August last year. And now....Well...
...it's not easily found anywhere. The usual websites tend to fall silent on the matter, and Hansard is not an easy stamping ground for looking at where the proposal has landed. Just how long is the long grass?
"Right to recall" is a messy process if handled incorrectly, which it might just be if the proposals are given the same treatment as those to reduce the number of MPs by 50 (which I support, though the specifics of the legislation has created some absolute howler constituencies ).
Would the trigger be an official Parliamentary review? In all cases? Would Liam Fox, for example, be subject to a recall by-election if the good burghers of North Somerset were able to organise enough signatures on a website? If Parliament or an independent review decides that Mr or Mrs MP has not committed an offence even though the "court of public opinion" thinks otherwise, would a petition still be allowed?
There's all the usual lines in the background about "turkeys", "christmas" and "the voting for", and of course professional troublemakers will be in their element attempting to deselect the Prime Minister for looking at them funny. (I notice the NUS has now gone very quiet over its ill-fated recall attempt for all those nasty Liberal Democrat MP, maybe the take up of their wacky scheme didn't match their lofty ambitions?).
I hope that someone can bring back the recall scheme where it belongs, because as a powerful tool it is one of the most effective. But it needs to be properly configured, and not open to the kind of nutter magnet tendencies you see in the (otherwise flawless) e-petition scheme. Members of Parliament have not been whiter-than-white....ever.....but the mood music at the moment has no patience for wrongdoing amongst our elected masters. "Right to recall" is not a very British policy and would take a while to slot into our mindset. (It has not moved from "shouldn't grumble" to "Whose Streets?! Our Streets?!" without any intervening period, despite the over-the-top self-promotion of the Occupy ''movement'').
"Right to recall" byelections would open up political and democratic debate, and Lord knows we need a bit more debate recently. They would be rare, of course, because the rules would require a structure that ensured it was used properly by both Parliament and the electors. Those MPs who slipped through the expenses scandal with only nips and cuts to their pride need to feel the heat of the "recall" threat - I'm a democrat, that's my default position, and recall triggers fits very comfortably into a democratic model.
The age of the local referendum and devolved power is approaching - the Localism Act is a great tool and one which the Liberal Democrats should be rightly proud of producing. This might not be a sexy subject, but it's important and relevant today as it was during the depths of the expenses scam.
But until someone pokes the Cabinet Office to remind them about this policy, one wonders if it'll ever be enacted? What's that people say about the more things change.....